![]() In conclusion, if you like a modern design, a handy undo button, a beautiful layout, and Linux support, then GitKraken is for you. This is a great place for users to discuss tips and ask/answer each other’s questions. GITKRAKEN REVIEW PROIt’s awesome to see such proximity between a company and the common folk, but when more technical problems arise, there isn’t really a place to go, other than to contact support if you are using the Pro version.Įditor’s Note: We launched our GitKraken Slack Community just after this article was written. git/hooks/) are not triggered, which made me stop using GitKraken in a specific project.Īnother weakness is that there is no forum for users to report issues (akin to something like Stack Overflow.) Don’t get me wrong, GitKraken is very active with the community just see their blog and Twitter feed. Git has many powerful capabilities buried in the depths. It provides secure Git integrations, a mighty conflict resolution tool and an undo button to act as your safety net for unavoidable mistakes. One weakness that I’ve experienced is the hooks. GitKraken Client reduces the risk of getting your repos into a bad state. The Software, by default, automatically collects and sends to Axosoft and/or its third party agents (a) general usage information, such as actions and durations of those actions and (b) bug reports when the Software. If there is light, there must be darkness, and yes, even GitKraken has its weaknesses. You provided zero source for this, so let me provide one for you (from GitKraken - Help - About - EULA: 2.4 Usage and Other Data. I want to go to any OS, download my favorite app and use it GitKraken gives me just that. GITKRAKEN REVIEW SOFTWAREThese are two pieces of software that I used for quite a while, but when I moved to Linux they were missing. Secondly, most of us know one or two really good Git GUIs: for example SourceTree or GitHub for Windows. GitKraken offers a modern view of how Git should be used and ends the starvation for a good Linux Git client. Other Linux GUIs are old-fashioned or complex and crowded. Others fill the screen with views that I only use once every four months and exist only because I messed up while reverting a commit. ![]() ![]() Let’s unpack this statement, shall we? First of all, most Git GUIs for Linux make me feel like I’m back to Windows 95, in need of multiple windows to do a simple commit and push. ![]() Why would I bring up Linux? For two reasons: Linux Git GUIs aren’t that good, and the real competition doesn’t have a Linux version. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |